I'm not quite sure how I feel about this. On one hand, it's good to have anominity when reporting on things that are being covered up but on the other hand the anominity allows for people to make false acusations. How do you all feel about this ruling?http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt ... 5b8b7.html
There are 2 sides to this, one bad, one good. The bad is that people are not free to speak their minds. The good is that posters like sparkless are no longer protected from their slander.
Being honest isn't slander. Still waiting to be served with that lawsuit you claimed you were filing against me months ago.
It's your lie, tell it any way you want to. Here is your exact quote.
I said I COULD file. You lost your protection. Keep it up.
I am NOT on the public dole. If you continue your slander, there will be consequences.