Northwest Indiana Discussion

Northwest Indiana's Leading Discussion Forum
It is currently Thu Jul 31, 2014 3:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:36 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
'Provocative, insensitive and uncaring': Fury after Obama backs mosque near site of September 11 disaster
Daily Mail [UK], by Daniel Boffey


Barack Obama has been hit by a furious backlash from victims of the September 11 terrorist attacks after he backed plans to build a mosque near Ground Zero.

The proposed site for the 13-storey building is close to where almost 3,000 people died nine years ago after Muslim hijackers flew two jet airliners into the World Trade Center.

Mr Obama expressed his support for the mosque, which will replace a building damaged by the attacks, at a White House meal celebrating Ramadan.

He said: ‘Let me be clear: As a citizen and as President I believe that Muslims have the same right to practise their religion as everyone else in this country.

BREAK

Debra Burlingame, a sister of a pilot killed when his plane was flown by a terrorist into the Pentagon and a spokesperson for victims’ families, said: ‘Barack Obama has abandoned America at the place where America’s heart was broken nine years ago, and where her true values were on display for all to see.’

Peter King, a Republican congressman in New York, said the President had been wrong to back the plan, adding: ‘It is insensitive and uncaring for the Muslim community to build a mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero.’

Sally Regenhard, whose firefighter son was killed at the World Trade Center, condemed the President for a 'gross lack of sensitivity to the 9/11 families and to the people who were lost.'

Republican House Minority Leader John Boehner said the decision to build the mosque wasn't an issue of religious freedom, but a matter of respect.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... owers.html

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:44 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Legitimate Questions for the President
Facebook, by
Sarah Palin


Mr. President, should they or should they not build a mosque steps away from where radical Islamists killed 3000 people? Please tell us your position. We all know that they have the right to do it, but should they? And, no, this is not above your pay grade. If those who wish to build this Ground Zero mosque are sincerely interested in encouraging positive "cross-cultural engagement" and dialogue to show a moderate and tolerant face of Islam, then why haven't they recognized that the decision to build a mosque at this particular location is doing just the opposite? Mr. President, why aren't you encouraging the mosque developers to accept Governor Paterson's generous offer of assistance in finding a new location for the mosque on state land if they move it away from Ground Zero? Why haven't they jumped at this offer? Why are they apparently so set on building a mosque steps from what you have described, in agreement with me, as "hallowed ground"? I believe these are legitimate questions to ask.


http://www.facebook.com/note.php?saved& ... 4718773587

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:05 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Sorry but when a Christian is talking about his faith and Jesus is on his mind it is impossible to slip up and say "My Muslim faith".




Quote:
Obama Apologizes for Stupid Americans’ Opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque
Canada Free Press, by Fred Dardick


It’s amazing that Obama lacked the foresight to see that supporting the construction of a $100 million mosque 2 blocks from Ground Zero, something that 70% of Americans oppose, won’t end well. But I guess when your closest advisors are Valerie Jarrett the slumlord, Robert Gibbs the clown, Rham Emmanuel the communist, and Michelle Obama the millionaire’s wife, equating “religious freedom” with an Islamic cultural center whose purpose is to promote Sharia law is the kind of progressive garbage you get.

For you liberals who somehow got forwarded this column and still don’t know what Sharia law is, allow me to enlighten you. It is the literal interpretation of Islam that leads to the widespread abuse and enslavement of women. It’s also called the reality of “that woman in Iran who’s waiting to see if she’s going to get stoned to death for adultery” rules. Who knows if she really committed adultery? In Islamic societies all a man has to do to give his wife the proverbial dirt nap, is simply claim she did.

Under Sharia law, men are the judge, jury and executioners of women, and Obama apparently thinks Americans are too stupid to know this. While Obama may be able to lawyer his way around the Ground Zero mosque as a “religious tolerance” issue, the rest of us know a load of bs when we see one.

Americans don’t give a hoot what the college professors and attorneys think. Allowing the Islamist barbarians who keep their boots firmly planted on women’s throats and brought the 9/11 massacre to our shores, to build their Arch de’ Terrorism 2 blocks from Ground Zero can kiss our you know what.

Not only do Americans view the structure as anything but a bridge to understanding, Islamists around the world will also rightly perceive the mosque in a very different light than the simple “right to build a place of worship”. They will see it as spitting in the face of evil America and hold it up as a shining example in their enslaved societies to promote hatred of the West. It will become a “stupid Americans let us build a mosque on their graves, so let’s finish the job and kill them all” kind of thing.

Ever wonder how the Islamic Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem got built smack dab on top of the ancient Jewish temple mount? I can promise you, it was no attempt to “build bridges” either that put it there. It was more like “let’s take over the Jews most treasured religious site and plant a mosque on it to show them who’s boss”. That’s why Jews pray at the Western Wall, because if they tried to visit the top of the temple mount, the Arabs would riot.

Every time Obama speaks to Muslims, it’s always how wonderful and understanding Islam is compared to our knuckle dragging Judeo-Christian customs. Rather than apologizing endlessly for America, and in this case our opposition to the Ground Zero mosque, how about being honest for a change, champ?

Over the past 100 years, America has brought peace and prosperity to billions around the world, while at the same time Muslims have been slaughtering and enslaving their neighbors, especially women, wholesale. Talk about the war that never ends. Shia vs. Sunni violence has been going on for centuries and, by the looks of Iraq, will continue for centuries more.


read more
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26570

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:33 pm
Posts: 1408
The article about this was in the Times today. I think he struck the right balance - they have the right to build, but is it the "right thing to do?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:23 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
This one is too.


Quote:
Michelle Obama made dusk visit to Great Mosque during Spanish Trip
Canada Free Press, by Judi McLoud


While President Barack Obama was “forcefully” endorsing the Ground Zero Mosque, Michelle Obama was paying homage with her presence to the Great Mosque at Granada, which overlooks what was once Islam’s most important outpost in Europe, the Alhambra palace in Granada.

There is no doubt about the influence of the Great Mosque of Granada overlooking Alhambra. One Spanish guidebook states that the Alhambra is to Granada what St.Peter’s is to Rome or St. Mark’s Square to Venice.

BREAK


The money to build the Ground Zero Mosque is said to be coming from Muslim countries.

Other than referring to it in passing, there has been no media coverage about Michelle Obama’s dusk visit to the Great Mosque at Granada. Prayer times at the mosque on Aug. 5 were 6:09 p.m. and 9:30 p.m.

While Michelle Obama was roundly criticized as a spendthrift American Marie Antoinette during her visit to Spain, was she on official Mosque business for her husband?

Were messages exchanged between Michelle Obama and the principals of the Great Mosque at Granada on August 5, 2010?


http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/26884

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Ground Zero mosque developer Sharif-El-Gamals criminal past revealed.
Mail Online, by Mail Foreign Service


The developer hoping to build a mosque near to the site of the September 11 attacks has a string of criminal convictions, it has emerged.

Sharif El-Gamal, a muslim, heads a property investment firm that owns the New York building where the $100 million (£65m) Islamic centre would open.

But the 37-year-old has a chequered past.

He pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct in 1990, driving while intoxicated in 1992 and attempted petit larceny (theft) in 1993.

The following year he was arrested on a charge of patronising a prostitute, which was pleaded down to disorderly conduct.

He also pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct after an arrest in 1998 for petit larceny, which was dropped to possession of stolen property, and after an arrest in 1999 for trespassing.

In 2006, El-Gamal was sued by a tenant who said the developer had roughed him up in a rent dispute. El-Gamal denied the claims, arguing that the tenant had attacked him.

The case was settled in 2008, records show. The tenant's lawyer said El-Gamal paid Vassiliev $15,000 (£10,000).


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldne ... ealed.html

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Mon Oct 11, 2010 2:43 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
President Obama Golfs 52 Times While U.S. Suffers
Human Events, by Emily Miller


Image

President Obama has played 52 rounds of golf in less than two years in office. The U.S. unemployment, down economy and two wars have not tampered his leisure time. In comparison, President Bush played a total of 24 rounds of golf in eight years.

The pictures of the President wearing oxford-style, brown and white golf shoes and zipping around green golf courses in an electric cart are insensitive and inappropriate.

While the United States is in a severe economic crisis, the unemployment rate is stuck at 9.6% and families struggle to make ends meet, Obama spends an average of four to five hours playing each 18-hole round of golf.

Golf is a leisure activity for the well-to-do. The White House does not say if the President pays the green fees himself, but the cost for an 18-hole round of golf includes greens fees, cart rental, tips, clubs and balls.

Obama plays with golf balls stamped with the number "44,” which Titleist makes specially for him. Whether the President pays for the balls or accepts them as a gift is unclear.


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=39367


WANT A GOOD LAUGH?

IF YOU THINK HE THROWS A BASEBALL LIKE A GIRL WAIT TILL YOU SEE THIS


http://www.breitbart.tv/see-obamas-golf-swing/

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:04 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
CBS Suppressed Public Supportfor Arizona Law But Eager to
Hype Public Disagreementwith Wisconsin’s Walker

NewsBusters, by Brent Baker


Last May when a CBS News poll first asked about Arizona’s immigration enforcement law and found majority support for it (52 percent), the CBS Evening News didn’t report the finding. Two months later, when backing jumped five points higher, the newscast gave it a sentence. And a month after that, when those favoring the Arizona law had risen to 59 percent in August, the evening newscast ignored that number and instead focused on how “Americans oppose building a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero,” a story the network used to castigate Americans, pivoting to how that opposition and “controversies over new mosques in Wisconsin and Kentucky have led some to question is America becoming Islamophobic, a prejudice against Muslims?”

Now, with a CBS News/New York Times survey finding the public in sync with the CBS newsroom, and out of sync with conservatives, Katie Couric trumpeted in teasing Monday’s program: “Our new poll finds most Americans oppose cutting the pay, benefits and union rights of public employees.” She soon announced: “In a CBS News/New York Times poll out tonight, 56 percent of Americans say they oppose cutting the pay and benefits of public workers to reduce state budget deficits and 60 percent oppose taking away collective bargaining rights.”

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bake ... z1FMeq3F8U


http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-bake ... isagreemen

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:39 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Critics contend Assistant Attorney General Loretta King guided more by racial politics than the law
Daily Caller, by Caroline May


Image

Attorney General Eric Holder may be the face of the Justice Department, but behind the scenes, a little-known assistant attorney general named Loretta King (no relation to Martin Luther King, Jr.) has been the driving force behind the DOJ’s recent, most questionable racially motivated decisions.

Neck-deep in the more divisive civil rights cases of the past several years — most notably the New Black Panther voter intimidation case and the recent Dayton, Ohio police department’s testing standards issue — the Obama appointed assistant attorney general has many wondering whether her guide is the law or racial politics.

“Some of the most outlandish policies of the Holder Justice Department over the last two years flow directly from Loretta King’s worldview,” J. Christian Adams, who worked with King while serving as a voting rights attorney at the Justice Department, told The Daily Caller.

According to Adams, race-based decision making has been a consistent staple of King’s actions and resume.

In testimony before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights about the New Black Panther case, former DOJ Voting Rights Section chief Christopher Coates explained that King ordered him to stop asking trial attorney applicants whether they would have a problem dealing with cases involving white victims.

“In the spring of 2009, Ms. King, who had by then been appointed Acting AAG [assistant attorney general] for Civil Rights by the Obama Administration, called me to her office and specifically instructed me that I was not to ask any other applicants whether they would be willing to, in effect, race-neutrally enforce the VRA [Voting Rights Act],” he testified. “Ms. King took offense that I was asking such a question of job applicants and directed me not to ask it because she does not support equal enforcement of the provisions of the VRA.”


http://dailycaller.com/2011/03/21/criti ... n-the-law/

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Mon Mar 21, 2011 7:45 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Brazil’s Anti-Obama Riots Ignored by Media
Big Journalism, by Susan Swift



A U.S. President beset by angry mobs screaming “Yankee Imperialist Go Home”, exploding Molotov cocktails, rubber bullets, tear gas, riot police.

In 2007 the MSNBC headline screamed “Protests greet Bush upon arrival in Brazil” and The Guardian one-upped it with “Angry crowds hunt Bush as protests mark start of Latin America tour”. Fast forward to 2011 as another U.S. President faces identical protests and riots. Funny thing, though, this time there is absolute stone cold silence on these protests and riots from the New York Times, CNN, AP, YahooNews, MSNBC, The Guardian, etc. (Politico to its credit reports it).

Sporting Che Guevera T-Shirts, radical leftist protestors “associated with the Socialist Workers Party, PSTU,” launched Molotov cocktails in front of the U.S. consulate to protest President Obama’s arrival in Rio. Military police fired rubber bullets at the crowd, using tear gas and billy clubs to chase away the violent, socialist and oh-so-intolerant protesters. It seems the Left is never satisfied. What’s a radical left-wing president to do?

What is most ironic about the Brazil protests is that the PSTU is a hard core socialist party in Brazil. While anti-Obama protests in the US consider Obama a socialist, the socialists in Brazil consider him a yankee capitalist, the bane of the Latin American left … PSTU says the protest is to bring “American imperialism” to the attention of the millions of Brazilians …

Hmmm. Could this be why the President “cancelled a public speech he was scheduled to deliver Sunday” in an “historic plaza” in the “heart of Rio de Janeiro?” Well, we may never know from most in the Make-Believe Media. Yahoo News and New York Times are too busy breathlessly praising Obama as the guru of Hoops citing his so-far superb basketball bracket noting that even women’s hoopsters have attracted Obama’s laser-like focus, promoting my new moniker for our Bookie-In-Chief: “Bracket Hoops” Obama.

Meanwhile, the NY Daily News staunchly defended Obama’s trip to Rio as a business trip, blasting conservatives who questioned Obama’s timing and point to his choice to bring the missus, kids, grammy and godmother along as proof that this is really a Spring Break vacation.


http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2011/03 ... -by-media/

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 1:25 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
'Death Squad': Full horror
emerges of how rogue U.S.
brigade murdered and mutilated
innocent Afghan civilians - and
kept their body parts as trophies

Daily Mail, by Daniel Bates


Shocking new details emerged today of how American soldiers formed a 'death squad' to randomly murder Afghan civilians and mutilate their corpses. An investigation by Rolling Stone magazine details how senior officers failed to stop troops killing Afghans and keeping their body parts as trophies. In one horrific episode, the magazine claims troops chopped off a dead Afghan boy's finger and later used it as 'gambling chip' in a game of cards. The damning dossier is likely to prove to be highly damaging for the Army still reeling from last week's revelations about the brutal acts of violence carried out

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... lians.html



The White House and especially DUMBO are directly responsible for this just like Bush was crucified on a daily basis for actions at Abu Ghraib.

I'm sure all you leftoids would agree huh?


The only difference is we now have a coward in the White House who has no problem with prosecuting our soldiers on the world stage and making examples out of them.





brigade?...

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 9:40 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
Did CBS Falsify Rally Footage to Favor Union Protesters?
Big Journalism, by P.J. Salvatore


The Freeper community caught something interesting in CBS’s footage of Madison’s tea party rally which featured Sarah Palin.

First, check out this commentary:

MADISON, Wis. – After weeks of relative quiet following the bruising battle over an anti-union collective bargaining bill, the state Capitol was again the scene of protests and counter-protests.

Hundreds of pro-union labor supporters are surrounding smaller groups of conservative Tea Party members attending a rally featuring former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Speaking at the tax day rally outside the Wisconsin Capitol, Palin called the crowd in Madison courageous for having stood up to “death threats and thug tactics” of those who opposed Gov. Scott Walker’s collective bargaining bill.


They put “death threats and thug tactics” in quotes. Of course they would. This is a network that helped perpetuate the ‘Blame Palin’ narrative in the wake of the Tucson tragedy.


http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/20 ... rotesters/


who the hell watches that SeeBS anymore?

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Sun Apr 17, 2011 12:02 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8684
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Moby Grape wrote:
Quote:
Did CBS Falsify Rally Footage to Favor Union Protesters?
Big Journalism, by P.J. Salvatore


The Freeper community caught something interesting in CBS’s footage of Madison’s tea party rally which featured Sarah Palin.

First, check out this commentary:

MADISON, Wis. – After weeks of relative quiet following the bruising battle over an anti-union collective bargaining bill, the state Capitol was again the scene of protests and counter-protests.

Hundreds of pro-union labor supporters are surrounding smaller groups of conservative Tea Party members attending a rally featuring former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Speaking at the tax day rally outside the Wisconsin Capitol, Palin called the crowd in Madison courageous for having stood up to “death threats and thug tactics” of those who opposed Gov. Scott Walker’s collective bargaining bill.


They put “death threats and thug tactics” in quotes. Of course they would. This is a network that helped perpetuate the ‘Blame Palin’ narrative in the wake of the Tucson tragedy.


http://bigjournalism.com/pjsalvatore/20 ... rotesters/


who the hell watches that SeeBS anymore?


After RaTHergate and their "fake but accurate" documents, I'm going to guess only hardcore lefties that want to be lied to.

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Wed Apr 20, 2011 12:30 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Quote:
CONFIRMED: CBS Editors Refuse To Release Full Audio Of Obama Hot Mic Recording!
by Andrew Marcus


Last weekend, His Presidency Barack Obama was captured making potentially offensive comments to a group of big money donors who had paid large sums of money for special access to His Presidency.

We observed that CBS only released “selectively edited” moments from the raw tape. We know how much the mainstream media values complete and full disclosure of recordings of this nature, so we found it curious, to say the least, that there was not one drop of intellectual curiosity from these guardians of media purity regarding the content of the full recording.

Maybe CBS’s motive has nothing to do with protecting His Presidency from potential embarrassment. Perhaps, like Nixon before them, CBS accidentally erased the portions of the recording that they have not released. Anything is possible, right?

Alas, no. John Romano, Publisher of the blog “Yes, But, However!” has confirmed with CBS’s Mark Knoller (via Twitter) that CBS has decided that they are not going to release the complete recording.

@markknoller Why haven’t you released all of the audio of President Obama’s “donor meeting”? If you have please link?

@markknoller This is my third request. Why will you not release the full audio of Obama’s donor conversation?

@yesbuthowever My editors decided against it.


http://biggovernment.com/amarcus/2011/0 ... recording/

_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WELL, SINCE OUR LEFTOID MEDIA REFUSES TO REPORT IT
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 11:19 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8684
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Obama has outside contract worth $100G for teleprompter coach

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 116 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group