MORE OBAMA LIES EXPOSED....

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Quote:

Caterpillar to cut 2500 jobs in the US
BBC News, by Staff

Caterpillar, the world’s largest construction and mining equipment maker, says it will permanently cut two thousand 500 jobs in the US. But the news comes as signs of economic recovery have allowed it to rehire five hundred and fifty workers The company has cut about 34 thousand full-time and contracted workers globally during the downturn. Caterpillar shares rose two point one to fifty-eight point 85 dollars in New York.

http://gbcghana.com/news/29173detail.html

Obama told Caterpillar employees STRAIGHT TO THEIR FACES that if the stimulus passed, they would not be laid off and those already laid off could return to work.

Hope and change????

anyone???

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Moby Grape wrote:

Obama said Caterpillar would rehire if the stimulus bill was passed.

Caterpillar claimed they never said that.

The stimulus bill was passed.

Caterpillar then laid off even more workers.

who is the liar?

BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!

Quote:

Caterpillar, Inc. says Obamacare would cost them $100 million in first year
Washington Examiner {DC], by J.P. Freire

Obamacare will take a huge chunk out of the American economy, so says Caterpillar, Inc., which said in a letter to House leadership that the bill under consideration would increase the company's health care costs by more than $100 million in the first year alone:

In a letter Thursday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Republican Leader John Boehner of Ohio, Caterpillar urged lawmakers to vote against the plan "because of the substantial cost burdens it would place on our shareholders, employees and retirees."

Caterpillar, the world's largest construction machinery manufacturer by sales, said it's particularly opposed to provisions in the bill that would expand Medicare taxes and mandate insurance coverage. The legislation would require nearly all companies to provide health insurance for their employees or face large fines.

One of the biggest arguments for Obamacare is that businesses are weighed down by current costs -- the bill is said to allow these businesses to invest their money more efficiently. Apparently that's not the case here.

The Peoria-based company is one of many hard-hit employers in Illinois, which has an unemployment rate of 12.2 percent. It's delusional to think that adding $100 million to their operating costs won't make it more difficult to hire. In fact, this is exactly what 130 economists said in their letter to President Obama yesterday saying that the bill was unquestionably a job killer.

Read more at the Washington Examiner : http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini ... z0ikpqV8RE

These jobs will be going to Mexico...

So when you union people finally lose your jobs for good don't blame the Republicans.

Blame your worthless messiah...he doesn't have a clue about business.

hope that change worked out for ya...

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Quote:

Deere says Health Care bill will cost it $150 million
Des Moines Register, by Dan Piller

Deere & Company, Iowa’s largest manufacturing employer, said in a statement this morning that the recently-passed health care legislation will cost the company $150 million after tax this year. The company said the impact would be felt primarily in the second quarter, between April 1 and July 1. Deere spokesman Ken Golden said the charge would be taken as a one-time cost to cover the new tax the Health Care bill imposes on subsidies paid to corporations for retiree prescription costs under a 2003 Medicare bill. “The 2003

http://blogs.desmoinesregister.com/dmr/ ... 0-million/

maybe the out of work unions can explain for you democrats why free health care ISN'T FREE!

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Quote:

The shameless, shocking hypocrisy and lies of President Obama
American Thinker, by Rick Moran

Peter Wehner of Commentary has done us a service. He has written a piece that goes into detail about what can only be construed as Obama's numerous and continuing outright lies.

Too numerous to list here, a sample will have to do:

Mr. Obama is also the person who, when he was running for the presidency, promised all health-care negotiations would be broadcast on C-SPAN (They weren't.), that he would accept public financing for his campaign (He didn't.), that he would put an end to "phony accounting" (He hasn't.), that lobbyists will not work in his White House (They do.), that he would slash earmarks by more than half (He has not.), that he opposed giving Miranda rights to terrorists (He favors them.), that he was against an individual health-care mandate (He supported it.), and that he would resist the temptation "to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long" (He succumbed to the temptation.).

Where, I wonder, does Mr. Obama rank these statements on his cherished Truth Meter?

And what are we to make of the fact that the very paragraph from Obama's speech where he laments the lack of truth in public statements includes - you guessed it - a false statement by Obama?

In his commencement address, Obama insists he doesn't know how to work an iPod. But here's an item that appeared on the Huffington Post on June 25, 2008:

WASHINGTON - Bob Dylan. Yo-Yo Ma. Sheryl Crow. Jay-Z. These aren't musical acts in a summer concert series: They're artists featured on Barack Obama's iPod.

"I have pretty eclectic tastes," the Democratic presidential contender said in an interview to be published in Friday's issue of Rolling Stone.

Is that distant sound we hear the Truth Meter going off again?

Ed Lasky adds to the list:

He lies all the time He lied about how often he attended services at Jeremiah Wright's church; he lied about how his parents met; how his uncle liberated Auschwitz; how his dad came to this country. The guy just lies about his own background and life. What a phony...and, btw, for someone who decries people's use of IPODs, why did he give one to Queen Elizabeth as a diplomatic gift - one filled with his own speeches. How priceless!

Obama appears to save his most consistent lying, as Ed points out, in his background information. He knows that if his ordinary, unremarkable life were to be exposed, the mystique he has so carefully built up over the years would be damaged, perhaps even destroyed.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... pocri.html

2012

I can't wait

edge540 · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:42 pm **Posts:** 7693

Moby Grape wrote:

American Thinker, by Rick Moran

You betcha Rick...LOL.

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Mr. Obama is also the person who, when he was running for the presidency, promised all health-care negotiations would be broadcast on C-SPAN (They weren't.), that he would accept public financing for his campaign (He didn't.), that he would put an end to "phony accounting" (He hasn't.), that lobbyists will not work in his White House (They do.), that he would slash earmarks by more than half (He has not.), that he opposed giving Miranda rights to terrorists (He favors them.), that he was against an individual health-care mandate (He supported it.), and that he would resist the temptation "to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long" (He succumbed to the temptation.).

edge540 · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:42 pm **Posts:** 7693

Nice copy & paste. Arc's going to have hissy fit & call that plagiarism. Shame on you.

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

racist540 wrote:

Nice copy & paste. Arc's going to have hissy fit & call that plagiarism. Shame on you.

Tsk tsk.....first you have to hide behind me and now you have to hide behind arclight.

Man up and try to take some responsibility for your whining, Son.

Thanks.

:smt006

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

edge540 wrote:

Nice copy & paste. Arc's going to have hissy fit & call that plagiarism. Shame on you.

huh?

viewtopic.php?f=7&t=6164&p=112031&hilit=shameless&sid=2b370ee2baa158f4b04e07f79c893951#p112031

edge540 · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:42 pm **Posts:** 7693

Quote:

Mr. Obama is also the person who, when he was running for the presidency promised...

That was joke.
You promised you would move to Texas if Obama was elected & you're still here.
Does Rick Moran know that?

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

You are an idiot.

happy jack · **Joined:** Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:32 am **Posts:** 3789

edge540 wrote:

That was joke.

Who are you - Tonto?
(Look for the post from Wed May 12, 2010 12:27 pm to be edited ASAP.)

Here's another example of edge's version of the King's English.

edge540 wrote:

Rangel doesn't have anything to do with the bit bull being dunce.

THD · **Joined:** Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:18 pm **Posts:** 751

happy jack wrote:

edge540 wrote:

That was joke.

(Look for the post from Wed May 12, 2010 12:27 pm to be edited ASAP.)

The old bigot is exactly like a two year old minus the IQ of a two year old. If you say that he's going to do something, he won't do it.
Geez, have any of you ever seen a guy his age so completely nuts? OK, besides gay Artie??
Arc also hit the nail on the head when he called him a "creep". This guy is just flat out weird in a really, really disturbing way.

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Quote:

The real unemployment rate? 16.6%
MSN.com, by Mary Engel

Jobless © Photodisc/SuperStock
Extra6/4/2010 11:00 AM ET
The real unemployment rate? 16.6%

The Labor Department's statistics don't include the underemployed and those who have stopped looking for work. This alternative measure creates a much higher number.
[Related content: jobs, construction, manufacturing, economy, financial crisis]
By Mary Engel
MSN Money

It's bad enough that the nation's jobless rate is 9.7%. But the real national employment rate is even higher than the U.S. Department of Labor's May figure shows.

The official unemployment index, based on a monthly survey of sample households, counts only people who reported looking for work in the past four weeks. It doesn't account for part-time workers who want to work more hours but can't, given the tight job market. And it doesn't include those who have given up trying to find work.

When the underemployed and the discouraged are added to the numbers, the unemployment rate rises to 16.6%. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, a unit of the Labor Department, began tracking this alternative measure -- known as the U-6 for its department classification -- in 1995 after economists lobbied for a method comparable to the way Japan, Canada and Western Europe count their unemployed.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/le ... -rate.aspx

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

Northwest Indiana Discussion

MORE OBAMA LIES EXPOSED....

Who is online