Northwest Indiana Discussion

Northwest Indiana's Leading Discussion Forum
It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 6:25 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 ... 98  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 12:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
HOUSING PRICES DROP TO 1986 LEVELS

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:09 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 13802
Thank a DEMOCRAT for this.


Quote:
Michigan welfare recipients get hundreds
for car repairs, clothing allowance

Human Events, by Tom Gantert


Michigan’s welfare recipients may get up to $900 from the state in car repairs every year, but the House of Representatives is trying to cut that to $500.

The car repair subsidies are part of a $6.4 million program the Department of Human Services has to help welfare recipients get a job and stay employed. Among many approved expenses, the program also includes up to $1,200 for welfare recipients to buy a car, and up to $500 for clothing allowance for job interviews and work.

“You've got to be kidding me,” said Jim Chioda, a tea party activist from Holland. “This floors me. … They keep finding more and more. … When are we going to stop? They need money to go to the movies? It’s ridiculous.”


http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=51275


_________________
Has Obama ever won a free and fair election based on the merits of his ideas?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Obama Abolishes the Press Conference

by Keith Koffler on May 4, 2012, 11:07 am

President Obama has held just one full length, multi-topic, solo press conference in the last six months, effectively abolishing the most accessible venue for American citizens to observe the thinking and learn the views of their leader.

It’s May, and the president has stood for only a single such news conference this year, a March 6 event in the briefing room. He’s had only three since last June, counting a November press conference in Hawaii that was supposed to be devoted to the just-held Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit but which veered off into other issues.

Nor does Obama generally allow questioning during brief appearances at the White House, such as when he makes statements with foreign leaders. Previous presidents, including George W. Bush, routinely took a couple of questions on the topic of the day at such gatherings.

Obama doing what he loves best at a press conference.

Bush also held fewer press conferences than he should have. But this doesn’t excuse Obama, who would seem especially obligated to appear before the press given his pledges to maintain an “openness” administration.

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 8:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Obama’s Pentagon Cuts Troops And Combat Capabilities But Keeps Civilian Personnel
Image
Hey, it’s not like we’re fighting a war . . . wait, yes we are.

Quote:
The Pentagon’s civilian workforce, which expanded dramatically during President Obama’s first three years, is not facing any significant reductions even as the Defense Department is slashing ground troops by more than 10 percent, retiring ships and combat planes, and putting off the purchases of some new weapons.

President Bush’s last budget, for fiscal 2009, pegged Defense Department civilians at 739,000, according to the department’s latest “Green Book” budget document on total spending.

This year, the number of civilians sits at 801,000, an increase of 62,000 personnel, or 8 percent; it is expected to decline by 1 percent next year.

Some defense analysts say this was not supposed to happen.

In the summer of 2010, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates announced a series of cost-saving initiatives that included keeping civilian employees to that year’s number of 778,000. The services started issuing press releases on the number of civilian jobs they had erased.

Two years later, civilian employment has risen by 23,000 personnel.

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Fed clears China's first US bank takeover

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:40 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 2630
Location: In the trenches
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:


Just got my Lake County Tax Bill today and the value of my house increased $3,000

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2012 10:09 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
chuckmo48 wrote:
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:


Just got my Lake County Tax Bill today and the value of my house increased $3,000
[/color]

Nah, that is just your appraisal, so Lake County democrats can collect higher taxes from you.

You cannot be foolish enough to believe that Lake County property that is north of 80-94, but not lake shore adjacent, has increased in value.

Nobody is looking to pay top dollar to move INTO LAKE STATION.

Thanks for the laugh;)

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 6:43 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 2:20 pm
Posts: 2395
Location: Hammond
My total assessment for my home and the adjacent lot jumped from $85,000 to $97,000. But the houses in my neighborhood have sold for $10,000-$40,000. There is no way I can get $97,000 in my neighborhood for my property. I would be lucky as heck to get 1/2 of that amount. :evil:

_________________
I am a life-long Hammond Resident. I am a practicing Catholic, and an adherant to the Teachings of Saint Francis of Assisi, who truly was the first enviornmentalist. He loved and appreciated all of God's creation, and I try my best to do the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:26 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
U.S. foreign-born population at highest level since 1920

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:49 pm
Posts: 8006
Location: Stupid Liberals!
Air Force Document: Drones Can Be Used To Spy On Americans

I amazed the left can ignore stuff like this when it comes from one of their own, can you imagine if this happened under President Bush what the outcry would be like?

_________________
-=Up All Night With=-
Image
- -={ARCLIGHT}=- -
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 6:34 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 3500
Tiger1 wrote:
My total assessment for my home and the adjacent lot jumped from $85,000 to $97,000. But the houses in my neighborhood have sold for $10,000-$40,000. There is no way I can get $97,000 in my neighborhood for my property. I would be lucky as heck to get 1/2 of that amount. :evil:

With all your exemptions, the annual property tax bill on your home is only $318/yr. It's no wonder Hammond has budget trouble with tax bills like this. IMO, there needs to be a minimum tax level of at least $1,000 per home so that everyone is paying their fair share of taxes.

_________________
If you want to reduce the number of bad guys on the streets, shoot them before you call 911


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 11:11 am
Posts: 2630
Location: In the trenches
sparks wrote:
Tiger1 wrote:
My total assessment for my home and the adjacent lot jumped from $85,000 to $97,000. But the houses in my neighborhood have sold for $10,000-$40,000. There is no way I can get $97,000 in my neighborhood for my property. I would be lucky as heck to get 1/2 of that amount. :evil:

With all your exemptions, the annual property tax bill on your home is only $318/yr.

WTF?...no wonder Hammond is hurting...If it is really that ridiculously low no one should complain about any perceived lack of city services...

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Posts: 1256
If your city officials were worth 1/4 of what you paid them. If semi-literate recycling "supervisors" and assistant deputy parks department employees weren't driving around in taxpayer-funded vehicles. If your Mayor wasn't giving senior citizens $500 tax breaks as a thank you for underpaying their taxes for decades on the backs of heavy industry. If loudmouths who chomp at the bit to pay more taxes (well, for everyone else to pay more taxes) weren't standing in line with their hands out for $30,000 municipal subsidies so their offspring could go to college to "study" communications, African-American history, feminist theory, and 18th-Century Latin-American literature. If the Mayor didn't waste taxpayer money to throw a ego-stroking party for his friends every summer. If fireman and city council members weren't given raises at will. IF more of your city officials and employees weren't related to each other. IF more than a handful of those same officials and employees had educational backgrounds beyond worthless Hammond high school diplomas. IF more of those same officials and employees had work experience outside of wasteful, redundant, do-nothing municipal employment. If, if, if, if....

Then MAYBE the city wouldn't be in the financial situation in which it currently finds itself. Then MAYBE your decrepit homes would be worth 1/4 to 1/2 of their assessed valuation. Then, MAYBE businesses other than low-end retail and bars would consider relocating to your berg. THEN maybe the tax burden would be spread around a larger population. It ain't gonna happen. The only people dumb enough to think outsiders will invest substantially in Hammond are the dopes who didn't get out in time. No one else is being fooled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 7:19 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm
Posts: 3500
chuckmo48 wrote:
sparks wrote:
Tiger1 wrote:
My total assessment for my home and the adjacent lot jumped from $85,000 to $97,000. But the houses in my neighborhood have sold for $10,000-$40,000. There is no way I can get $97,000 in my neighborhood for my property. I would be lucky as heck to get 1/2 of that amount. :evil:

With all your exemptions, the annual property tax bill on your home is only $318/yr.

WTF?...no wonder Hammond is hurting...If it is really that ridiculously low no one should complain about any perceived lack of city services...

I will send you a PM with her address so you can see for yourself how low her tax bill is. However, since her income comes from social security disability, the meager bill is paid for by the taxpayers.

_________________
If you want to reduce the number of bad guys on the streets, shoot them before you call 911


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Change
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 7:34 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 pm
Posts: 1256
sparks wrote:
However, since her income comes from social security disability, the meager bill is paid for by the taxpayers.


From who or where will the College Bound money for your daughter's tuition be coming? Does Tom McDermott pick it like lettuce in his backyard garden?

Oh, and when you're patting yourself on your chubby little back for all the charities you say you support, do you account for the fact that you would not be able to do so if you weren't literally taking money (to the tune of $30,000) out of the mouths of Hammond's poorest residents, widows, orphans, and disabled veterans so you don't have to pay your own kid's college tuition?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1463 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 ... 98  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group