| Northwest Indiana Discussion http://www.northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/ |
|
| Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham http://www.northwestindiana.com/discussionforum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3465 |
Page 30 of 31 |
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Wed Apr 12, 2017 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Mon Apr 17, 2017 10:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
      
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Mon Apr 24, 2017 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
‘Shattered’ Revelation: Clinton Campaign Hatched Russian Hacking Narrative 24 Hours After Hillary’s Loss  The Russians you say? I thought it was us deplorables that denied you the Presidency. [/s] The new Clinton campaign tell-all, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, reveals how Hillary Clinton personally placed blame for her bruising defeat on Russian meddling “within twenty-four hours of her concession speech.†The blistering behind-the-scenes book, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, illustrates how Hillary Clinton furiously blamed her defeat on the FBI investigation into her private emails, Russian interference, and Trump’s supposed support from “white nationalists.†From Shattered: On a phone call with a longtime friend a couple of days after the election, Hillary was much less accepting of her defeat. She put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency: the FBI (Comey), the KGB (the old name for Russia’s intelligence service), and the KKK (the support Trump got from white nationalists). “I’m angry,†Hillary told her friend. And exhausted. After two brutal campaigns against Sanders and Trump, Hillary now had to explain the failure to friends in a seemingly endless round of phone calls. That was taking a toll on her already weary and grief-stricken soul. But mostly, she was mad— mad that she’d lost and that the country would have to endure a Trump presidency. |
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Tue Apr 25, 2017 7:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
Hey Tiger, Remember before the election, when the LMSM was cackling about how "Donald Trump was going to destroy the Republican Party". And after the election it turned out that Hillary and Obama just destroyed the entire leadership of the democratic party instead? Well I think that is a pretty funny joke! Heh Heh Heh! Plus all the money that giant corporations and foreign governments wasted buying influence from the Clinton Foundation, who now has no influence to payback all those multi-million dollar donations! Man that one is a knee slapper! But the cherry on top is going to be getting to install a true conservative on the Supreme Court. Maybe more than one, Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't looking healthy... Good times...good times... I don't get a chance to gloat like this on FB, but check the look on Barry's face. It looks like he just got a great big delivery of sour-grapes and crow to eat. The great part is that because he by passed Congress and did everything "with a phone and a pen" by executive order, everything can now just as easily be undone. Maybe I should put this picture in my signature file so chuckmo and edge can see it and be reminded everytime they read MY POSTS! Yes? 
|
|
| Author: | Tiger1 [ Tue Apr 25, 2017 8:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote: Hey Tiger, Remember before the election, when the LMSM was cackling about how "Donald Trump was going to destroy the Republican Party". And after the election it turned out that Hillary and Obama just destroyed the entire leadership of the democratic party instead? Well I think that is a pretty funny joke! Heh Heh Heh! Plus all the money that giant corporations and foreign governments wasted buying influence from the Clinton Foundation, who now has no influence to payback all those multi-million dollar donations! Man that one is a knee slapper! But the cherry on top is going to be getting to install a true conservative on the Supreme Court. Maybe more than one, Ruth Bader Ginsberg isn't looking healthy... Good times...good times... I don't get a chance to gloat like this on FB, but check the look on Barry's face. It looks like he just got a great big delivery of sour-grapes and crow to eat. The great part is that because he by passed Congress and did everything "with a phone and a pen" by executive order, everything can now just as easily be undone. Maybe I should put this picture in my signature file so chuckmo and edge can see it and be reminded everytime they read MY POSTS! Yes? I just love the liberal tears !!! Yeah, the demonrats thought they had it all wrapped up, and the people spoke, and they lost. After 8 years of a community organizer in the White House, the people finally won, and the libs are throwing tantrums. Go ahead and gloat, as all conservatives are finally vindicated. Use that pic, Arc !!! As for the Supreme Court, Ginsberg looks to be very ill. One more spot on the Supreme Court for a conservative is coming up shortly. |
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Mon May 01, 2017 7:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Tue May 02, 2017 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
Hillary Clinton: I’m ‘part of the resistance’  The "biggest" insider, I truly mean that in more ways than one...is now part of a "resistance" movement...she is worth $200+ million...it's kinda, sorta, maybe like Obummer fighting for the little guy, while earning $400k for a speech to Wall Street (Remember OWS?), or signing a deal for $60 Mil for a book...should we remind everyone of Mr. "Socialist" (feel the burn) Sanders and his three houses?? These democratic hypocrite/ conmen (and the idiots who fall for the con job and vote for them) need to ride off into the sunset...She may be "part of the resistance" but thankfully...SHE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT!!! Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton identified herself as a member of the widespread resistance movement to President Trump on Tuesday afternoon. “I’m back to now being an activist citizen and part of the resistance,†she said to thunderous applause at the Women for Women International 2017 annual luncheon in New York. During an onstage interview, just before declaring herself part of the resistance, Clinton said she spent decades learning what it would take to help move the people of the United States forward, including those who did not vote for her. She said that she didn’t want to appeal to emotions the same way that Trump did and had hoped to have serious conversations about health care, foreign policy, renewable energy, artificial intelligence and so on during the campaign. |
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Wed May 03, 2017 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
Hillary Clinton To Launch New PAC  They can call it "The Loser’s Club" and chuckmo can be the chairman of the board. Hillary Clinton is planning to soon launch a new political action committee without the intention of making another run for public office. The failed 2016 Democratic presidential candidate will start the PAC to “act as a quiet catalyst†for organizations she supports and help 2018 congressional candidates, Axios reported Wednesday. Clinton’s PAC will be focused on “lifting up organizations that are the product of the energy and activism she has seen since the election, and existing groups that have been reignited and reinvigorated by that energy,†a source familiar with the planning told Axios. The source revealed that the PAC will not be a way for Clinton to comment on President Trump’s activities but also said she “won’t shy away from it.†|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Sat May 06, 2017 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
State Dept. Ordered to Release Clinton Emails on Obama’s Response to Benghazi  Giver her the same due process she wanted to give Nixon. There is more criminality here than in Nixon's missing 18 minutes. Guaranteed. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson has ordered the State Department to turn over previously redacted material in Hillary Clinton’s emails that immediately followed the terrorist attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi to Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog group. Judicial Watch announced on Friday that the State Department will need to turn over “eight identical paragraphs†of redacted documents from Clinton emails sent on September 13, 2012, detailing phone calls made by then-President Barack Obama to the Egyptian and Libyan leaders after the Benghazi terror attack two days earlier. The two Clinton emails, which were housed on the former secretary of state’s unsecured private server, were the same: “Quick Summary of POTUS Calls to Presidents of Libya and Egypt.†|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Wed May 10, 2017 8:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Fri May 12, 2017 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
Comey Plotted To Avoid Charges Against Hillary Before The FBI Interviewed Her  So basically interviewing her was just a show, for the sake of appearance. Amidst the fallout from the firing of FBI director James Comey, a new report reveals that Comey actually planned not to recommend charges against Hillary Clinton over the use of her private email server well before she was interviewed by the FBI. The lengthy report featured in The New Yorker portrays Comey as an individual who had a tragic fall from grace in his futile attempt to be the independent man in Washington, D.C. Buried in the piece is this explosive nugget (emphasis added): As the inquiry neared its end, Comey, who had closely monitored it from the start, requested summaries of more than thirty government prosecutions involving mishandling of classified information. He waded through the records, seeking to understand the cases’ rationale and how they had been resolved. In the end, he agreed with the investigators’ unanimous conclusion: Clinton should not face criminal charges… Comey had his own ideas. Unbeknownst to his Justice Department colleagues, Comey had resolved to proceed alone with the announcement. Since May, he had been holding a parallel series of meetings with top F.B.I. confidants to thrash through his plan. He would publicly announce—and explain—the Clinton decision without Lynch at his side. “We had discussions for months about what this looked like,†Michael Steinbach, who retired as the F.B.I.’s executive assistant director for national security in February, 2017, said. “This, for us, was the best course of action, given the political situation that we were in—for us to do it independently.†As Comey saw it, according to Steinbach and others familiar with his thinking, the public doubted Lynch’s independence and would be less likely to accept the decision if she were involved in announcing it. Clinton wasn’t interviewed until July 2. That means a couple of months before the subject of the investigation was interviewed, Comey was plotting a course of action to make the decision not to recommend charges against her seem more palatable to the public. |
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Wed May 17, 2017 12:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
|
|
| Author: | -={ARCLIGHT}=- [ Fri May 26, 2017 7:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Scrape the Bottom - Vote for Rodham |
Hillary Clinton, Still Bitter, Dismisses Those ‘Crazy’ Third-Party Candidates  She had two bites at the apple and lost TWICE, it is her fault, and her fault alone. But like every liberal she blames everyone but herself. The third-party candidates who ran for president in 2016 are “crazy,†according to Hillary Clinton. The Democrat used the pejorative to describe the outsiders who challenged her and Donald Trump during an interview for a profile at New York magazine. Clinton lamented what she sees as left-wing news outlets hiring right-leaning pundits in order to appeal to conservative viewers. “When I mention MSNBC’s hiring of conservatives including George Will, and The New York Times’ new climate-change-skeptic opinion columnist, Bret Stephens, her brow furrows,†NY magazine’s Rebecca Traister writes. “Why…would…you…do…that?†Clinton responded. “Sixty-six million people voted for me, plus, you know, the crazy third-party people,†she continued. 
|
|
| Page 30 of 31 | All times are UTC - 6 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|