chuckmo48 wrote:
He is doing this on the backs of the working class people...which, again as I have said, represents the majority of us on this board...
That's quite a presumption on your part chuckmo. Even if true, the "majority of us" on this board have clearly and decisively rejected unionism as just another cancerous wing of the Democratic Party. I think most of us do just fine supporting our families without union representation, would overwhelmingly reject it given the choice, and view those who NEED union representation as lazy, weak-minded, simps....you know...kinda like
chuckmo48. It's comical when a guy like chuckmo tries to convince the rest of us that we should feel like him....a guy who owes everything he has to the taxpayer and ridiculous union contracts. If chuckmo really knows that the "majority of us" are "working class", then he also knows that unlike him, we're funding our own retirements. I don't blame him for what he has, but it's laughable when he tells us that we should just continue to go along with it when we are the ones having our backs broken by the likes of him.
Chuckmo, why did you willingly
LIE about your social security status..a personal matter that you could have and should have kept quiet about?