JCMT

Amy Wigs · **Joined:** Sun Jun 05, 2005 8:11 pm **Posts:** 755

Quote:

Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 727 Amy Wigs wrote:
MT/JCMT, you are sick and should be ashamed.

Did I agree with Joanne's politics? No. It didn't make her a bad human being. It didn't make her evil.

I literally got sick to my stomach reading your crap.

For shame, sir. For shame.

Quote:

I have presented no disparaging words re Joann. What specifically is it that you find ing, that after her death, I have called out your benefactor, Mayor Thomas McDermott and bring to light his quest for power money and your good friend sparkie's fevering efforts to support the mayor's underhanded tactics.

Where were you when Matonovich was alive? Where were you when she did not support McDermott's self serving policies and now his efforts to stifle free speech.

Wiggs you sit on a couple of boards for McDermott and your husband is employeed by McDermott. You sound more like a lap dog.

Despite what is said about you Wiggs, Jesus loves you.

_________________
Einstein said, "Try not to beome a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value."[/i] : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3MoSyp8D0s Mayor McDermott's call in a criminal matter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9M_ezo2nFA

Last edited by justcallmetommy on Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top

justcallmetommy Post subject: Re: Joann Matonovich passes awayPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 12:17 am

Quote:

McDermott clearly muddied Joannâ€™s name while she sat on the city Council, now he throws hugs and kisses, please! Despite what people do say about you, at least Jesus loves you.

That other thread was about the passing of Joanne. It should stay that way for the people who are grieving.

You know, McDermott's toadies are giggling with delight over those posts. My husband couldn't get job with the city even if he tried to bribed someone. Because he's my husband. I am persona non grata at city hall. Especially since I slammed Fowler and McDermott over the whole recycling dept fiasco. But you know this. You responded to my post. We all know that you're go to card is to accuse someone and/or their relatives of sitting on a board and/or working for the city.

I am curious, though. What boards do I sit on? This close to Christmas, I could really use the paychecks. Seriously though, which boards?

Where was I when Joanne was alive? I was her neighbor. I lived right around the corner from her and we shared a precinct as committeewoman (her being the D, I being the R). I learned a lot about her as a human being and I think the world lost someone special when she passed.

What do I think of the mayor and his reaction? I think he was being civil. What would you have had him do? Complain how she wouldn't just fall inline with whatever he wanted? Don't you think the time for that was past?

A word of advice. You need to be careful. The way you say Jesus loves me (yes, he does) in such a sarcastic manner, that's not a good thing. I say this with all sincerity.

I hope you have a Merry Christmas.

Amy Wigsmoen

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

Well, thank you for your reply.

I stand behind my post.

Regarding McDermott, his actions, words speak volumes, just as they did with his quote in the times encapsulated in the Joann article.

In fact another poster here brought McDermott's quote to my attention only because they could not post it themselves as they are known to the McDermott clan. They were as well afraid of the intimidation initiated through the McDermott clan. They can be exceptionally vicious.

In my love for man kind, we can only wish that the feds continue their inquiry into McDermott and others and that our dear good friend Bobbie Cantrell says, "give my kids and me immunity and I will talk."

Regarding your financial concerns, I wish you the best.

And you are right, I am a mean and miserable man.

hammonite · **Joined:** Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:58 pm **Posts:** 762

Ms. Wigg,

From what I have read from jcmt, it seems like he has some history with McDermott, where timmie may have wronged him.

It may not have been exactly appropriate with in the Mantonavich post, but he does have a point with the quote attributed to McDermott. People say what they think.

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

Wiggs,

If I have offended you, my apologies.

mattlap · **Joined:** Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:24 am **Posts:** 2529

justcallmetommy wrote:

Wiggs,

If I have offended you, my apologies.

Where is the part where you admit you made crap up? I think a further apology is deserved .....

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

mattlap wrote:

justcallmetommy wrote:

Wiggs,

If I have offended you, my apologies.

Where is the part where you admit you made crap up? I think a further apology is deserved .....

Perhaps we should just leave it to Amy to decide whether or not she accepts the apology.

If you feel the need to put your two cents in then I suggest you find the nearest Salvation Army kettle and put it somewhere that it might make a difference.

Merry Christmas

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

mattlap wrote:

justcallmetommy wrote:

Wiggs,

If I have offended you, my apologies.

Where is the part where you admit you made crap up? I think a further apology is deserved .....

Excuse me, Matt, I never said nor do I now say that I made anything up. The content I stand behind. Nothing, I repeat nothing was made up.

She may not have liked the tone and I can respect that.

Despite what you may think Matt, No further apology is deserved! No Matt that is not correct. I could care less what you may think on this subject matter.

mattlap · **Joined:** Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:24 am **Posts:** 2529

justcallmetommy wrote:

mattlap wrote:

justcallmetommy wrote:

Wiggs,

If I have offended you, my apologies.

Where is the part where you admit you made crap up? I think a further apology is deserved .....

Excuse me, Matt, I never said nor do I now say that I made anything up. The content I stand behind. Nothing, I repeat nothing was made up.

She may not have liked the tone and I can respect that.

Despite what you may think Matt, No further apology is deserved! No Matt that is not correct. I could care less what you may think on this subject matter.

Ok .... Amy asked what boards she sits on? You haven't answered her yet. The same goes for her husband being employed by McDermott.

I don't give a rats ass what you think of my thoughts. Your asinine posts on here are rather insignificant and you take away from those with legitimate beefs with the direction of Hammond.

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

Ditto Matt...Ditto

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

USMarine · **Joined:** Thu Aug 07, 2008 4:55 am **Posts:** 10483

splorks wrote:

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

Then why don't you leave (again) and stay gone this time, wee-wee boy.

Bye-Bye..... :smt006

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Mon Dec 21, 2009 6:40 pm

sparks wrote:

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

Oh yeah sparky, where is that link to the thread where YOU revealed YOUR identity?

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

sparks wrote:

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

BYE Bye, SPARKIE for someone who has openly endorsed the use of police department resource to stifle first amendment, freedom of speech rights, don't let the door hit you in the a$$. In fact you were damn proud of this abuse of power.

I find it disgust

ing that someone would be proud and use the threat of stifling free speech as a badge of honor. YOU ARE THE PRIME EXAMPLE WHY HAMMOND HAS ITS PROBLEMS. THE USE OF CITY RESOURCES, CODE, POLICE AND OTHER AGENCIES TO CAUSE PERSONAL HARM.

simply, you are disgust

ing.

Moby Grape · **Joined:** Sun Nov 12, 2006 12:19 pm **Posts:** 13802

sparks wrote:

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

See ya....and don't let the door hit you in the ass...

LaughingAtLakeCo · **Joined:** Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 pm **Posts:** 1435

Moby Grape wrote:

sparks wrote:

Amy, I'm starting to think that discussing topics on Facebook with rational people who don't hide behind screen names is more enjoyable than this board. BTW, I think the comments MT made were positively ghoulish.

See ya....and don't let the door hit you in the ass...

Cut Spunk some slack. Its a big target.

Northwest Indiana Discussion

JCMT

Who is online