The irony of it

bert68 · **Joined:** Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:33 pm **Posts:** 1672

I caught some kind of replay show on wjob today, It was Steve Fowler and some guy Bill Baker on together in the afternoon and they had Mitch Daniels on as a guest. Mitch, during the course of the interview, spoke about the high cost of government and bloated payrolls in LC municipal governments and the detriment that posed to economic growth in LC cities and towns. There was the now cardboard picker-upper agreeing with the Governor. How many government jobs has the stick picker-upper had since that interview?

LaughingAtLakeCo · **Joined:** Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 pm **Posts:** 1435

I'll bet he's sorry he never ask Mr. Dedelow about the tape erase button. But you do know that Mr. Fowler is "a Republican nationally but a Democrat locally", right? As to how many government positions he has held....who knows? I'm surprised that with has matinee-idol looks he was never able to find employment as a well-paid male model.

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

LaughingAtLakeCo wrote:

I'll bet he's sorry he never ask Mr. Dedelow about the tape erase button. But you do know that Mr. Fowler is "a Republican nationally but a Democrat locally", right? As to how many government positions he has held....who knows? I'm surprised that with has matinee-idol looks he was never able to find employment as a well-paid male model.

Since you seem to find him so attractive, maybe he would be willing to service your needs for a fee. It's not exactly government work but it would be tax free cash for the Oracle's last minute Christmas shopping!

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:31 pm

sparks wrote:

Since you seem to find him so attractive, maybe he would be willing to service your needs for a fee.

It always comes back to homo-eroticism with sparky.

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:

sparks wrote:

Since you seem to find him so attractive, maybe he would be willing to service your needs for a fee.

It always comes back to homo-eroticism with sparky.

There's nothing wrong with LALC expressing his attraction to the Oracle or with me pointing it out. I think your own latent homosexual tendencies make you feel threatened by the mere discussion of gay sex. Or, you're jealous because LALC isn't hitting on you.

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Mon Dec 24, 2012 1:43 am

princess sparkles wrote:

There's nothing wrong with LALC expressing his attraction to the Oracle or with me pointing it out. I think your own latent homosexual tendencies make you feel threatened by the mere discussion of gay sex. Or, you're jealous because LALC isn't hitting on you.

No one here is fooled by your subterfuge.

You ALWAYS revert to homo-erotic subterfuge, and that says a lot more about YOUR state of mind, not mine.

You and I both know how many times I called you on it.

But like a typical secular progressive you are unable to take responsibility for your own thoughts and actions.

Every time you question another's motivation and conclude they are about homo-erotic leanings, it is because you recognize those motivations in your own self.

The only person you are fooling is your self, not any one else here, the pattern has been going on for far too long.

sparks · **Joined:** Tue Nov 14, 2006 4:17 pm **Posts:** 3800

-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:

princess sparkles wrote:

There's nothing wrong with LALC expressing his attraction to the Oracle or with me pointing it out. I think your own latent homosexual tendencies make you feel threatened by the mere discussion of gay sex. Or, you're jealous because LALC isn't hitting on you.

No one here is fooled by your subterfuge.

You ALWAYS revert to homo-erotic subterfuge, and that says a lot more about YOUR state of mind, not mine.

You and I both know how many times I called you on it.

But like a typical secular progressive you are unable to take responsibility for your own thoughts and actions.

Every time you question another's motivation and conclude they are about homo-erotic leanings, it is because you recognize those motivations in your own self.

The only person you are fooling is your self, not any one else here, the pattern has been going on for far too long.

being gay is a normal part of human sexual relations. No one is this board is surprised by your gay bashing remarks.Bigots like you usually hate gays too.

-={ARCLIGHT}=- · **Posted:** Mon Dec 24, 2012 8:22 am

sparks wrote:

being gay is a normal part of human sexual relations. No one is this board is surprised by your gay bashing remarks.Bigots like you usually hate gays too.

No one is bashing you for being gay, quite the opposite, we are merely acknowledging it.

It is quite obvious the way that you try to assign the queer factor to others motivations, when they are really your own deeply held ones.

justcallmetommy · **Joined:** Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm **Posts:** 5662

-={ARCLIGHT}=- wrote:

sparks wrote:

being gay is a normal part of human sexual relations. No one is this board is surprised by your gay bashing remarks.Bigots like you usually hate gays too.

No one is bashing you for being gay, quite the opposite, we are merely acknowledging it.

It is quite obvious the way that you try to assign the queer factor to others motivations, when they are really your own deeply held ones.

nothing like hitting the nail on it's head.

Neometric · **Joined:** Wed Sep 23, 2009 1:29 pm **Posts:** 630

The irony? Lo...the parody

Northwest Indiana Discussion

The irony of it

Who is online