Northwest Indiana Discussion

Northwest Indiana's Leading Discussion Forum
It is currently Tue Jun 04, 2024 7:15 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:40 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Hammond
Hey Tommy,
I ;love your idea.
Let's see how serious our Man Mitch is about ridding Lake County of the corruption he's always talking about.
The message is going out this afternoon.
Let the chips fall where they may.

_________________
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:15 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 5662
Free, I would formulate a letter, not an email.

I would foraward to the Governor and the Attorney General, your contact with both the County Prosecutor and State Police giving details of the conversation.

Lets see where it goes.

_________________
XMPT wrote in Dermott Minions now stating No Sweet House? Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:04 am. Hammonite you might want to say a prayer to your God for freetime. She got back what she dished out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 6:30 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:33 pm
Posts: 1672
freetime wrote:
justcallmetommy wrote:
Matt,

so if we dont have the money, we can build a $52,000,000 wolf lake project and put another $22,000,000 debt on the back of the hammond taxpayers.

We can spend a $1,000,000plus on a legal clinic that reportedly employs political campaign operatives of mcdermott, at least employed them in the recent past until some got better administration jobs.

$2,000,000 on cost moving the hammond health care administration to McSr.

$150,000 on the statue of liberty which hammond taxpayers are still paying for as it is a warehouse on our tab.

This is what little we know.

That not including the chump change employing likes of Innes, fowler and a perverbial host of others.

Mis mangement.

Matt you understand the $52,000,000 wolf lake project is to put trades people to work so that they will PAC for McDermott.

The Jacob Sq deal, well who is building the properties and what tie do they have with McD? If there is none, great, but this administration lies, misrepresents information, hides information, which brings great concern to what is going on with in this city. McDermott should come clean.

WHERE IS THE BUDGET FOR 2008 AND 2009? WHY IS IT NOT POSTED ON THE CITY WEB SITE?

THE WAY MCD HID, FAILED TO ANSWER CLEARLY, WHAT EVER VERBAGE YA WANT TO USE, THE FUNDING FOR THE FESTIVAL ADDS TO THE BELIEF MOST THINGS AROUND THIS GUY ARE SMOKE AND MONEY IN HIS & HIS FRIENDS AND FAMLIES POCKET.

CALL ME JADED, ABSOLUTELY, CALL ME NEGATIVE IF YOU WISH, BUT THE FACTS CONTAINED WITH IN THE AUDIT ARE FACTS.

THEN YOU HAVE PEOPLE LIE BERT ABOVE WITH THE ONE LINE RESPONSE THAT THIS IS A CONSPIRACY. PLEASE BERT YOU INSULTING YOUR SELF, ACTUALLY BERT, NO YOUR SHOWING THE LEVEL OF YOUR INTELLIGENCE.

THIS AUDIT PROBABLY WILL NEVER SEE THE LIGHT OF DAY.


I was just going to nominate Bert for the most sarcastic post of the year! I'm pretty sure Bert knows darn well what's going on in Hammond.
His method of expressing it is sarcasm. Correct me if I'm wrong Bert.
I LOVE his sarcastic posts!



It was pure sarcasm Free, thanks for the compliment.

_________________
Eat it up, wear it out, make it do, or do without.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:33 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 762
Matt

In reading your post, it appears that you have worked at discounting the State Audit Findings by simply lumping the whole audit into underfunded pension liability. Now your starting to sound like Fowler. Dont get angry... read on.

Reading through the post which are quoted directly from the Audit, there are serious mismanagment and misrepresentation by our Mayor. For example, I believe I read McDermott stating the Wolf Lake project was not going to cost Hammond residents any moola. Well, our share of the tab is $22,000,000. McDermott got nailed with regard to the Casino Revenue spending, that all expenditures need to be approved by the City Council. There are missing receipts which appear to be a problem in several governmental agencies starting at the port authority and untimely deposits else where.

Festival Receipts were destroyed, cash income vs expenses did not match, in effect stopping any type of audit, poor managment controlls on payroll, time keeping, benefit time. There is lots of potential play with $600,000 expenditure on the Festival. The report put together by the current CFO, is woefully inadequate and should call for his termination. He has a responsibility to bring to the attention of the taxpayers such problems and prevent them from occurring again.

Then we have the OT issue $25,000 directly for one employee Pat Moore Jr, the same guy who took a city vehicle and exposed our city to tremendous amounts of liability and I am absolutely sure he was not drinking at a notre dame foot ball game, absolutely sure.

I find it exceptionally disheartining that the Sanitary District, which I believe included our infamous Stevie Fowler, as a board member. We all know Folwer as a legal expert, having an exceptional background which qualifies him to sit on such a board. Fowler was a waiter, former dishwasher, come garbage man and now a general foreman and most recent a Talk Show Host who's program is paid for by Mayor McDermott. Fowlers promotions come at the Hand of Mayor McDermott. Fowler can be heard on the newly purchased McDermott radio station and spews bs on the airways regarding his vast knowledge base. (I actually am embarassed for McDermott that he couldn't do better than Fowler as a mouth piece).

Well Mr. Fowler and the other Sanitary District Members may have some liability here. I am no attorney, but they voted upon, approved and instituted a rate increase, collecting trash fees ignoring constitutional law. The city council needed to approve this action.

Quote:
RATE NOT APPROVED BY COUNCIL (SANITARY DISTRICT)
The Sanitary District Board approved a resolution increasing the garbage collection fee for the
Sanitation Utility. This increased fee has not been approved by the Hammond City Council in the form of
an Ordinance
.


Not only did the legal eagle who represented the sanitary district, but our own Notre Dame law school graduate and practicing Attorney, Mayor Thomas McDermott missed this constitutional requirement.

There is a lotta stuff here other than underfunding of a pension plans.

I think I read some other post that we are to be a republic, but McDermott believes it is a fiefdom.


Last edited by hammonite on Sat Jan 09, 2010 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:26 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:24 am
Posts: 2529
hammonite wrote:
Matt

In reading your post, it appears that you have worked at discounting the State Audit Findings by simply lumping the whole audit into underfunded pension liability. Now your starting to sound like Fowler. Dont get angry... read on.



IF you read (not sure you are capable) thru this entire post, the pension issue was only one that I touched upon. Another was the overdrawn accounts. Both of these issues are minor in scope and will be found in just about every municipality of NW Indiana when audited. They are still problems, but can be explained. It was Tommy that brought up the pension and I answered his post.

Now the Wolf Lake project is completely ridiculous and a waste of money. There are definitely improvements that could be made at Wolf Lake. Hammond could bring more jobs in the form of a professional business park on part of that land bringing well paying jobs instead of the limited retail jobs he has. I think they should have built an exercise facility on the north end of the City, possibly partnering with Whiting. The size and scope of the current project is ridiculous for the little give back it gives the residents. But in that 22 Million the City will spend, they are counting money already spent in that as well. The money spent on the clubhouse (needed but way too much money) and the money spent on Indianapolis blvd (waste!). City money is also being spent on the Robertsdale little league fields Improvements can be made there, but I feel the plans are too extravagant again and are going to carve up the park even more.

I can't remember whether I answered this thread or the other post on the Moore Jr Overtime. I stated that Hamm was incompetent for not catching it. I also blamed the fire dept book keeper, and even the controllers office for not catching it. There is no excuse for it. Head should roll.

I think the Mayor's plans for downtown are almost completely ridiculous. There might be a valid argument to a new city hall, but moving it to the Bank Calumet is idiocy. Expensive, obsolete building and does very little for downtown. Some of the report (waste of money for what it said ...) is right, but is common sense and not worthy of the money spent. Hammond needs to cultivate the art and niche market that is developing in downtown hammond It won't be easy and won't be quick. You need a draw that people are willing to travel to and galleries, music and niche retail are the right direction.

And as for Recycling / Garbage being passed to Sanitation. I have been against it all along and have posted such. I think it was rearranging deck chairs for a paper gain in job cuts. I also think the charge is nothing other than a defacto tax as service fee. I don't know the legality of the City Council not passing the rate, but they did approve the transfer of the department. That would be one for the lawyers, but first you would have to find one willing to take the case. I just don't know if there is a case there. Even if you did win the case however, the council would come back and pass the rate after the fact. My guess is that the sanitation board would then up rates to make up for the payment of the lawsuit. In the end we will still pay for it one way or another.

_________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:42 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Hammond
I'm not so sure about the HSD being able to retroactively collect money to make up for their alleged mistake.
They have a very well paid lawyer, he should bear some responsibility here.

_________________
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:24 am
Posts: 2529
freetime wrote:
I'm not so sure about the HSD being able to retroactively collect money to make up for their alleged mistake.
They have a very well paid lawyer, he should bear some responsibility here.


Free,

One way or another it will have to be paid for by the sanitation dept. They are not allowed to run a deficit That money isn't just going to go away into a black hole. It will be paid on the backs of the taxpayer.

_________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell

"None are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsely believe they are free." Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 762
mattlap wrote:
freetime wrote:
I'm not so sure about the HSD being able to retroactively collect money to make up for their alleged mistake.
They have a very well paid lawyer, he should bear some responsibility here.


Free
One way or another it will have to be paid for by the sanitation dept. They are not allowed to run a deficit That money isn't just going to go away into a black hole. It will be paid on the backs of the taxpayer.


Matt, if you read some of the auditor notes, there is a phrase used with regard to paying bills without following the appropriate process which states the individuals may be personally held liable.

Let's hope there is a god, as it is clear malfeasance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Hammond
The Times has a pretty good story today about the audit.

http://nwitimes.com/news/local/lake/art ... mode=story

Read it all the way to the bottom. You'll see City Controller Robert Lendi's incredible statement that "AlL in all, we're pleased with it " (the audit)

Unbelievable!

_________________
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:03 am 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:58 pm
Posts: 762
mattlap wrote:
freetime wrote:
I'm not so sure about the HSD being able to retroactively collect money to make up for their alleged mistake.
They have a very well paid lawyer, he should bear some responsibility here.


Free,

One way or another it will have to be paid for by the sanitation dept. They are not allowed to run a deficit That money isn't just going to go away into a black hole. It will be paid on the backs of the taxpayer.


Maybe such action very well may change the electoral outcome of the next election, sort of a wake up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:36 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Hammond
As I said a couple of days ago, there is getting to be a very long list of reasons to not vote for McDermott the next time.
I hope others will join me then in writing letters to the editor summing it all up.
I sure wish we still had a public access channel at cable. Leave it to this administration to allow the loss of that form of public expression.
For all its problems, Gary still has a public access channel!
Mcmayor's failure to do anything to get Comcast to keep the channel going, unlike what Dedelow did, is just one more reason to dump him.

_________________
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:21 am 
Offline
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Hammond
On WJOB this morning, Jed mentioned a Post Tribune story about the Hammond audit. He got sidetracked ny some other issues before he talked about it.
I couldn't find any such story when I searched at the P-T. That's not unusual, though, as I often have bad luck finding stories that way.
Did anyone see this story? How about posting a link?

_________________
"The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth."

_________________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:18 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 5662
Been out of town for a few days, Miami, then Vegas. Restfull, very restfull.

The story in the times regarding the audit, was fluf, there was a lot more meat there that they didn't touch upon.

What would be interesting is someone filing a freedom of informaiton request for the mayor's 2007 & 2008 expenses, along with details in the Audit report.

If I read the material correctly, the last audit stated 80% of McDermott's expenses were with out receipts. The current Audit never addressed a percent, neith report addressed a $$ amount.

As with any IRS tax audit, any expenses not supported by receipts is disallowed. This policy is the baseline established by the IRS. Therefore any money's Mr. McDermott received from the city with out receipts was income, unreported income.

As the city receives substantial federal funding, any mismangement may be a federal violation-crime. I understand from informaiton from a Radio Talk Show Host, this amount is over $100,000 during this period of time.

Free, Deep throat?

_________________
XMPT wrote in Dermott Minions now stating No Sweet House? Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:04 am. Hammonite you might want to say a prayer to your God for freetime. She got back what she dished out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:34 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 5662
Actually Free, all the effort they put in on you should be a compliment to you. I can imagine some city employees sitting at their desk during office hours banging away at the computer trying to cover all their tracks.

I believe a calumet city mayor, Genova, went to jail for someone working on his home, directing staff during their normal working hours to do campaign work, to pay ot to city employees who were doing campagin work after hours.

I wonder of Mr Fowler or Mr. Innes used their city cars to drive to and from the radio station studio's. I certainly hope they are reimbursing the Hammond taxpayer, the mileage for this extranious travel. They should reimburse the city on a weekly or monthly basis for this personal use. I would be more concerned with regard to the liability they are exposing Hammond residents.

Are any of these municipal vehicles seen at Flat Rock? Hmmm.

There has been absolutely no focus placed on why the 2008 & 2009 budgets have not been posted on Gohammond.com. And with all the hype on the charter school and wolf lake projects, I don't think I have read anything rearding who completed the design and construction.

Wanna Bet ya there is a tie to the financial campaign to McDermott.

It would be nice to have this information come out in a scandal before the election.

_________________
XMPT wrote in Dermott Minions now stating No Sweet House? Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:04 am. Hammonite you might want to say a prayer to your God for freetime. She got back what she dished out.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hammond Audit Out
PostPosted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 7:35 pm 
Offline
Senior Member

Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 8:25 pm
Posts: 5662
Hey Free, this is a very hot topic, 1100 hits in less than what a week? Nice Job!

_________________
XMPT wrote in Dermott Minions now stating No Sweet House? Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 9:04 am. Hammonite you might want to say a prayer to your God for freetime. She got back what she dished out.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group